Talk:Rope light
Add topicLatest comment: 12 years ago by Jim.henderson in topic Incandescent
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rope light article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Incandescent
[edit]Why the limitation in the title? Better to drop the term "LED" in the title and make the article more general, with a section about LED where that makes a difference. Jim.henderson (talk) 12:00, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
- Looks like good work so far, if mostly unreferenced (no worse than the original, though). Jeh (talk) 10:34, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
- Yeah, when encountering a neglected article on a justly neglected topic lacking in controversy, I pay small attention to refs. If many bits of an article need the same change, some editors might get it done quickly by a search and replace, but I like to give a heads up a day in advance, and then do a section or a few paragraphs at a time, especially when working with prose that's clumsy, overstuffed, overwrought or otherwise not appropriate WP:TONE. Such changes are separated by pauses of a day or sometimes two, to encourage objections or refinements from others. I expect to do the actual page move tomorrow and final changes during the week, unless someone offers a better idea meanwhile. Jim.henderson (talk) 11:15, 13 July 2014 (UTC)