Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga
Latest comment: 4 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The title of episode 1 is 群鶏一鶴. I ran this kanji through Google Translate and the transliteration came out as "Gunkei Ikkaku". Even in the anime itself, the narrator reads it as such. I know Google Translate is not the only translator online, and I've tried at least six other translator websites, but it's the only one that not only translates kanji, but transliterates it and has an audio pronunciation feature, Unfortunately, User:GalaxyFighter55 insists the transliteration is "Gunkeinoistukaku", which is incorrect, as it doesn't sound Japanese and is most likely misspelled. Furthermore, he has an issue with me reverting his plot summary edit, insisting that the chicken sex scenes are important to the plot summary. Instead of accepting his mistakes, he doubled-down and reverted my corrections, threatening to report me to a mod talk page. - Areaseven (talk) 04:57, 20 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
Not to butt in since the ordeal as been settled, but the irony here is your "correction" was also a slight mistranslation as well, and claiming the original "doesn't sound Japanese" when you yourself don't even know the language is a completely absurd comment to make, regardless of what Romanization ended up being correct. Additionally, you committed blanket reverting (constitutes WP:DE) instead of editing the actual issues you had at hand. It wasn't just the edits you described. And one more thing: You failed to even mention the "chicken sex" plot point issue until later in the edit war, which leads me to believe you were just trying to come up with a way to justify the blanket reverting. --GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 05:17, 20 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
