Talk:Romanian Wikipedia
Add topic | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article was nominated for deletion on February 18, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep. |
Romanian & Moldovan Wikipedia
[edit]Have you already heard about this? Do you think that in that article can be written anything about it? D T G 19:54, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
Aromanian Wikipedia
[edit]It is true that the Aromanian Wikipedia has never got anywhere. Despite the insistence of the people who wanted it set up that it was going to be a proper Wikipedia, they have created not even fifty pages in two years of existence. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.136.1.101 (talk) 14:34, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
- So you do think that it should be mentioned in article about _romanian wikipedia_? D_T_G (PL) 10:08, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
- Well, it should be mentioned that the Aromanian Wikipedia was basically trialled on the Romanian Wikipedia first (sort of like an Aromanian test-wiki was set up on ro.wp) and that the idea for the Aromanian Wikipedia came from the Romanian Wikipedia community.
Ronline ✉ 13:08, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
- Well, it should be mentioned that the Aromanian Wikipedia was basically trialled on the Romanian Wikipedia first (sort of like an Aromanian test-wiki was set up on ro.wp) and that the idea for the Aromanian Wikipedia came from the Romanian Wikipedia community.
Romanian wikipedia = stubpedia, 10 random article ---> 8 stub, like this: "Melissia este un oraş în Grecia.". Useless, ridiculous. It's a fact, why delete? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.99.86.86 (talk) 17:34, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Article count
[edit]Actually, Romanian Wikipedia is now in 21st position, but it could easily get to 19th. It could also do a lot worse, so maybe we should say it "struggles to be in the first 20" or something... --Venatoreng 08:41, 9 September 2007 (UTC)