Talk:Roman dominating set

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Technology

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force

Feedback from New Page Review process

Latest comment: 4 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Thanks for this graph theory page for a particular dominating set that has been discussed by a variety of different sources as its primary topics; those sources are from a range of different authors over time, showing sustained covered. Keep an eye on MOS:BOLD, which recommends using bold only very sparingly; there's a bit of over-use here.

Klbrain (talk) 16:13, 21 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.

Talk:Roman dominating set

Feedback from New Page Review process