Talk:Rokt
Add topicLatest comment: 11 months ago by CNMall41 in topic Unicorn status
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
 | This article contains a translation of Rokt from es.wikipedia. (1308470399 et seq.) |
Unicorn status
[edit]By now, Rokt should be notable enough as a unicorn that's going public soon. It's also in Spanish, French, and Japanese (Wikipedias), which I based this version on. I trimmed out some fluff such as excessive lists of Rokt's partners, removed dead links, and also inserted some more recent citations.
I think it's an American company, but would it also technically be an Australian company too since it's founded in Australia? I'm confused about this. Zeitgeistheistmann (talk) 17:31, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
- I looked at the translations and the connections made by editors in Wikidata. They raise a red flag as it relates to potentially conflicts of interest. Note that having a Wikipedia page in a language other than English is not considered automatically notable for all other Wikipedia languages. There is also nothing in WP:NCORP about inherent notability for a company that is considered "unicorn". Are you able to point out the WP:THREE for notability? --CNMall41 (talk) 18:04, 29 August 2025 (UTC)