Talk:Roger Rose
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 10 months ago by Eric Carpenter in topic Could An Editor Please Add A Better Infobox Photo? Fast?!
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
| This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Could An Editor Please Add A Better Infobox Photo? Fast?!
[edit]
Could some clever Wikipedia editor please add a better, less repugnant infobox photo of Roger Rose? As long as it is a photo that is free to use!
The current photo is HORRIBLE and needs to changed, it makes Rose look hideous and ugly, please someone change and upload a new, better and more flattering photo!
Categories:
- Biography articles of living people
- Stub-Class biography articles
- Stub-Class biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Arts and entertainment work group articles
- Automatically assessed biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Stub-Class Chicago articles
- Unknown-importance Chicago articles
- WikiProject Chicago articles

