Talk:Roderic Dallas/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Hawkeye7 (talk) 04:08, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Comment Could you put some alt text on the main pic? Hawkeye7 (talk) 04:19, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Heh, there's always something...! Tks, done. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 05:24, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

On behalf of Georgejdorner and myself, tks for review, Hawkeye! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 05:47, 24 March 2010 (UTC)