Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23c234a19f28cc1

Jump to content

Talk:Rodeo Beach

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 14 years ago by John of Reading in topic Merger proposal merge fromRodeo Cove

The URL for ref. 4 doesn't work (now); apparently this one reaches the place that that one did: http://www.sfei.org/sites/default/files/RodeoLagoonHEFinalReport116_0.pdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.189.171.31 (talk) 15:42, 7 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Merger proposal merge fromRodeo Cove

[edit]

There are separate articles for Rodeo Beach (created 2006, with a small amount of content), and Rodeo Cove (created 2007, with almost no content). Although these features aren't identical, they're inextricable, and one page to cover both seems to make sense. I don't see any other instances in this region of two separate articles covering a bay and its beach. The Rodeo Beach article has more detail, and appears to be a more commonly used name, so I suggest retaining that and making Rodeo Cove into a redirect. A separate section for Rodeo Cove on the beach article could usefully cover marine features. There may be some need to change the West Marin geographic navigation template as well. Rupert Clayton (talk) 00:43, 8 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

That sounds very reasonable to me. —Stepheng3 (talk) 01:10, 8 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
Yes -- John of Reading (talk) 07:26, 8 February 2012 (UTC)Reply