Talk:Roblox

Suggestions

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

• Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.^[?]
• Consider adding more links to the article; per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Linking and Wikipedia:Build the web, create links to relevant articles.^[?]
• Per MOS:CAPTION, Images should have concise captions.^[?]
• As per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers, dates shouldn't use ^th; for example, instead of (if such appeared in the article) using January 30^th was a great day, use January 30 was a great day.^[?]
• Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Section headings, headings generally should not repeat the title of the article. For example, if the article was Ferdinand Magellan, instead of using the heading ==Magellan's journey==, use ==Journey==.^[?] Thinking of Roblox Studio
• Per criterion 2b of Wikipedia:Featured article criteria and Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Layout#Headings and sections, this article's table of contents (ToC) may be too long – consider shrinking it down by merging short sections or using a proper system of daughter pages as per Wikipedia:Summary style.^[?]
• This article may need to undergo summary style, where a series of appropriate subpages are used. For example, if the article is United States, then an appropriate subpage would be History of the United States, such that a summary of the subpage exists on the mother article, while the subpage goes into more detail.^[?]
• Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.^[?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, — Yours, Berrely • ^Talk∕_Contribs 08:55, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Also, a few of my suggestions:

• Remove citations from lead per WP:CITELEAD
• Try to make the article have a better flow. Some sentences are quite short and can easily be merged with other sentences.
• Expand the infobox: There are many more parameters that can be filled there; there isn't even a link to the website!
• External links should go above references (at least I believe)
• In § Development, it seems to read as more a timeline than an actual paragraph
• There are some sections that can easily be merged, for example § Players, is this really worth a whole section?
• This is just my opinion, but the article seems to go into a bit too much detail. All of the sets include a code that can be used to redeem virtual items.

Once again, just some of my opinions, I may be completely wrong! — Yours, Berrely • ^Talk∕_Contribs 09:05, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

User:Berrely, I've implemented a couple of your suggestions, there is a bit of a problem with LEADCITE, since most of the content in the lead is not actually cited elsewhere in the article, we have to keep the citations there for now, or otherwise it would fail WP:V. I'm not entirely sure how to fix that at the moment, but expanding the "Development" section (which is definitely the weakest one IMO) to include a more general overview of the history of Roblox might help, and would also help with the other problems with that section. I am fairly sure, from looking at a few prominent articles, that References are supposed to be above external links though. Devonian Wombat (talk) 03:46, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Devonian Wombat, sorry for replying so late! Apologies I was viewing on mobile and got confused by the references, you are correct on that front. The reason there shouldn't be citations in the lead is that the lead is meant to relay information already said in the article, but this is not a huge problem. Good job on massively improving this article (really comparing the current article from when you first edited it and now is astounding)! — Yours, Berrely • ^Talk∕_Contribs 09:19, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

• I suggest splitting the Erik Cassel article from ROBLOX; Why on earth is Erik Cassel not a separate article? Erik is a vital person to ROBLOX's history, and articles like Alex Balfanz, Uplift Games or Adopt Me! have already been developed without any questioning from the community, so the Erik Cassel page should also be a separate one from ROBLOX. This does not deserve to be a redirect page. It's way more important than that. He also doesn't have a minor appearance like the developers mentioned in this, he literally was one of the creators of the game. MatEditzWiki (talk 15:03, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

  Notability is not inherited. Every topic is evaluated separately. For Erik Cassel to have an article, reliable secondary sourcing that meets WP:GNG must be provided. -- ferret (talk) 15:10, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

  Good source for Erik Cassel's huge involvement in Roblox - I believe these two together at minimum are sufficient reliable secondary sources. Countless articles from large outlets mention and build upon this trove of information. Shredux (talk) 23:06, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

References

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 20:15, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that in July 2020, over half of all children in the United States under the age of 16 played Roblox?

• Source: https://www.pcgamer.com/au/roblox-is-now-the-game-of-choice-for-over-half-of-all-us-kids/

• • Reviewed:

Improved to Good Article status by NegativeMP1 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

🐝 B33net 🐝 18:48, 15 March 2025 (UTC).

• Hook is interesting and matches the article (By July 2020, Roblox had over 164 million monthly active users, including half of all American children under the age of 16.) And the source also verifies it. Article looks good (recently promoted to good article status) and has no copyvios according to Earwig's (it matches an Aliexpres source but I reckon it's a copy of Wikipedia). No QPQ needed. Good to go. ―Panamitsu (talk) 22:48, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
  • Can confirm the Aliexpres source is a mirror from this permadiff. Nothing to worry about. Tarlby ^{(t) (c)} 23:38, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
    • Apologies, but I fail to see how this hook is remotely interesting. It's just saying that the game for kids is played by kids. 🌙Eclipse (she/they/all neos • talk • edits) 15:06, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
      • No, it's saying that a huge proportion of children in a hugely populated country are playing one particular game. That's something like 30 million kids depending on which population estimate you use. That's a pretty interesting degree of cultural dominance imo. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 19:41, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
        • @Premeditated Chaos: Fine then. I don't mind. I'm going to suggest an alt hook, though. ALT1: ... that Roblox players can exchange Robux, the platform's virtual currency, for real-world money? (source: ) 🌙Eclipse (she/they/all neos • talk • edits) 00:01, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
          • Without trying to be too much of a pill, that seems way less interesting to me than the original. Having a virtual economy that integrates real money is hardly new; ie Eve Online. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:37, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
            • Striked hook. 🌙Eclipse (she/they/all neos • talk • edits) 00:43, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
        • @LunaEclipse: @Premeditated Chaos: I agree. Over half the population of children in the United States, the third most populated country in the world. That’s an incredibly huge number of people playing 1 game. That’s the equivalent of filling every NFL stadium thirtyfold (yes, I did the math) 🐝 B33net 🐝 9:30, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
          • Crazy math... Tarlby ^{(t) (c)} 01:07, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

Discussion about the Infobox logo

Please see the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Infoboxes#Monochrome company logos with light/dark mode radio buttons. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 20:46, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Should we add the controversial template in talk?

Roblox is a controversial online game platform. It is considered a controversial gaming platform due to a lack of moderation, lack of safety for children, financial exploitation and etc.

Should we add the {{controversial}} template here? VitorFriboquen :] (Talk) 16:47, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

'Although critic reviews for Roblox have been positive'

This is not cited and generally meaningless and imo should be binned Shredux (talk) 09:01, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Removing Iran from "Restrictions by country"

Roblox is not blocked or banned in Iran, and the name of Iran does not appear in the source that was incloded. Wahbarz01 (talk) 16:24, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

Roblox unblocked in Russia. Russia's Day Special

On 10 June 2026, Minkomsvyaz officially confirmed that Roblox had been unblocked in Russia. See also: Censorship of Roblox#Russia AlexN-2004 (talk) 15:12, 12 June 2026 (UTC)

Roblox tier division now in effect

Roblox officially split into three tiers (Roblox Kids, Roblox Select, standard Roblox) on 16 June 2026, this took effect worldwide as well. Wikipedian5122024 (talk) 19:33, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

Roblox unblocked in Turkey

On 18 June 2026, Roblox has been unblocked in Turkey, according to Webtekno and multiple tech-focused outlets. See also: Censorship of Roblox#Turkey AlexN-2004 (talk) 21:37, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

Outdated Robux Logo in the Virtual Curreny section

you should probably update the outdated robux logo in the virtual currency section because the robux icon is no longer a yellow gradient but is white now.. Klingri1 (talk) 16:37, 20 June 2026 (UTC)

Note

To the editor (unfortunately) editing this, You might want to put a note of the previous names of roblox plus. Tankishguy 13:11, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

"Roblox Rant Restoration Movement" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Roblox Rant Restoration Movement has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 July 10 § Roblox Rant Restoration Movement until a consensus is reached. ~ A412 ^talk! 15:20, 10 July 2026 (UTC)

GrapheneOS support

TL;DR, The Roblox Support page linked in this post (I can't send the link here because of the spam blacklist, the actual link is in the post) lists GrapheneOS as a supported platform so long as the bootloader is locked.

I'm still not sure whether it should be listed on its own or as a note tag over Android, or if it should even be listed at all. Zenphia1 (talk) 19:36, 24 July 2026 (UTC)