Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
”A retired Court of Appeal judge, Sir Richard Aikens, has said the case is arguable and ought to be heard.“ is cited from Richard Spillett, Tim Stickings, “Former appeal judge says legality of the Brexit extension should be tested in court“ in Daily Mail dated 3 April 2019. Copying reference here, as I can’t find another and some editors are busy deleting all references to the Mail. Moonraker (talk) 05:28, 20 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
That's because the Daily Mail is not a reliable source. A community discussion concluded that "Consensus has determined that the Daily Mail (including its online version, dailymail.co.uk) is generally unreliable, and its use as a reference is to be generally prohibited, especially when other more reliable sources exist." But, regardless of the Daily Mail saying that a retired appeal court judge has said the case is "arguable", it was rejected anyway, so it seems he was wrong. Emeraude (talk) 08:26, 20 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 8 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
@KGxHeretic: You added a source to this article stating that Tilbrook is the chairman of the trade union Workers of England. British industrial law is not my specialty, but it seemed strange to me that the source for this claim was an article about the Workers of England being sued for supposedly deceptive media credentials. Anyway, the website for Workers of England self-identifies the group as "a fully independent trade union". Anti-racist advocacy group Hope not Hate describes Workers of England as "not a real trade union" (, and elsewhere calls it "a fake union" (). I can't really seem to find any sources about this union that aren't from Hope not Hate or self-published by the union. While I think Hope not Hate is likely WP:PARTISAN (I don't really know about their political affiliations or reliability, I certainly wouldn't say "Tilbrook leads a fake trade union"), I removed the label of trade union from the article as it appeared to be dubious. If you know of any other sources relating to Tilbrook's involvement with Workers of England, it might be worth adding to the article, as well as a sentence containing the attributed rebuttal from Hope not Hate. --LivelyRatification (talk) 20:40, 28 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=small}
