Talk:Robiatherium
Add topicLatest comment: 1 year ago by ZooBlazer in topic GA Review
 | Robiatherium has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: February 5, 2025. (Reviewed version). |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Robiatherium/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: PrimalMustelid (talk · contribs) 15:13, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: ZooBlazer (talk · contribs) 00:52, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
I should have have my comments posted soon. -- ZooBlazer 00:52, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
Review
[edit]Just curious, could the skeletal image not be used in the infobox?
- Add alt text to both images
The genus name derives from the locality of Robiac in France where some of its fossil were described plus the Greek θήρ/therium meaning "beast" or "wild animal"
– Need some commas, plus change fossil to fossils, so something like this overall --> "The genus name derives from the locality of Robiac in France, where some of its fossils were described, plus the Greek θήρ/therium, meaning "beast" or "wild animal"."He said that in 1978, he then defined
– Reword this so it's not he, hehe determined recently
– What is considered recently?belonged not to the Xiphodontidae but the Anoplotheriinae
– Add a comma after XiphodontidaeTylopoda, along with the Amphimerycidae and Xiphodontidae split earlier
– Add a comma after Xiphodontidaeand another work
– Maybe be more specific, or at least word it differentlyfocusing most specifically on
– You can just remove "most specifically"- Link Grande Coupure extinction event
No copyright issues detected and spotchecks came back fine. Overall, a nice article. Just a few things to clean up. -- ZooBlazer 01:21, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
- Implemented all suggestions, let me know if there's anything else that I need to do or missed. PrimalMustelid (talk) 01:48, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
- Looks good to me. Happy to promote. -- ZooBlazer 01:53, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.