Talk:Robert Rotenberg
Add topic| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 | It is requested that an image or photograph of Robert Rotenberg be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other websites. |
Advertising law firm
[edit]I'm not going to get into an add/delete war with a "contributor" who is just a floating IP address (wasn't Wikipedia toughening up on this sort of thing?), but I disagree strongly with putting an external Web link (enabled or not) in the introductory paragraph of a Wikipedia entry. This Wikipedia entry is not exclusively about the subject individual's involvement in the law firm represented by this Web link, so the inclusion of the link in the opening smacks of advertising, not useful supplementary information. If the Web site in question does provide supplementary information and rounds out the individual's profile, its best and most appropriate position in the entry is in the External Links section at the end of the entry. This is in keeping what Wikipedia recommends (see the Wikipedia policy on External links).
I've only been editing and making Wikipedia contributions since 2005, so maybe I'm not fully versed in what is proper here. If the floating IP address contributor or some credible, experienced Wikipedia contributor can clarify what is best here, I'm always eager to learn more. VickiZ (talk) 23:41, 3 January 2010 (UTC)