Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22dde7aeae55e37

Jump to content

Talk:Rob Barber

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Cassdotcom in topic Income bracket

Earnings

[edit]

Rob Barber gained public notoriety after being identified as the audience member on Question Time who claimed despite earning over £80,000.00 per annum, he was not part of the top 5% of UK earners.  Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.99.184.160 (talkcontribs) 18:42, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[1]Reply

References

I dispute that Barber has gained enough notoriety from his idiotic comments on one QT episode to be eligible for a Wikipedia article.

Semi-protected edit request on 22 November 2019

[edit]

The following information needs adding to the article.

Became Nationally famous in the UK when he appeared on BBC's Question time on the 21st November 2019 accusing the Labour Party of lying that earning over £80,000 did not put him in the top 5% earners in the UK, even though it did.

reference https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/bbc-question-time-man-who-20935155 Langers2uk (talk) 20:12, 22 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Done, in my own words. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:17, 22 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Income bracket

[edit]

Why has the statement showing his claims were false been removed? It's been referenced correctly. Cassdotcom (talk) 17:37, 26 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

DOB

[edit]

Mirror source likely got age as 36 from his website: https://www.prbracing.co.uk/team-info/

edit at: 19:35, 27 November 2019‎ 2a00:23c6:b00a:c601:b146:b96d:ea6c:a986 removing fair information whilst also correcting DOB (as '1979') without a source is suggestive of self editing of the article - have left DOB as of this edit  Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:4B00:9D39:1800:B503:53F5:DA98:F585 (talk)