Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a253ee473f45cb43

Jump to content

Talk:Rjukan Line

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 17 years ago by Pyrotec in topic Norsk / English
Good articleRjukan Line has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 2, 2008Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on December 14, 2006.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that in 1944 a railway ferry on the Norwegian railway Rjukanbanen (pictured) was sunk to 430 meters depth to prevent Nazi Germany from developing nuclear weapons?

Nazi Germany

[edit]

The article could be a little clearer on how this prevented Nazi Germany from developing nukes. savidan(talk) (e@) 21:13, 12 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Yes, it should. It should also say that the amount of heavy water the Nazis had wasn't enough to make nukes anyway. -Rouleau
I've altered the article to be a little more specific about the sinking. The full story of the aftermath of the sabotage operation is a story best left to its own article. -Freekee 04:10, 15 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Norsk / English

[edit]

The term 'kalkammonsalpeter', which appears in the Rjukan Line#Decline section refers to some type of nitrate, possibly calcium nitrate? Its not potassium nitrate, since potassium- seems to be pott- .Pyrotec (talk) 19:18, 2 October 2008 (UTC)Reply