Talk:Rivelin Rocks
Add topicLatest comment: 18 years ago by VinceBowdren in topic Formatting
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Location
[edit]The article apparently contradicts itself. In the first section it claims the rocks are on private property. In the second section it claims the rocks are within the bounds of a National Park.
They could fall across a boundary, but the article is not specific enough to be clear. 82.68.152.186
- Apologies if I'm being presumptious, but it sounds like you're thinking of national parks in the USA sense, where I believe they are publicly owned and preserved as wilderness. In the UK version of national parks, plenty of land is privately owned. They are not preserved as human-free wilderness areas, but as regular countryside (with private land, agriculture, buildings, small settlements, even light industry) with added protection to prevent over-development. Does this answer your question? --VinceBowdren 15:38, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
Formatting
[edit]Any idea what is wrong with the formatting on this document - the edit links are at the end. I have had a look but cannot spot an obvious issue (the refs are all okay). RobChafer 14:05, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
- I think they got pushed around when you have pictures on the right-hand side of the page, which take up the position the edit link would normally go. --VinceBowdren 17:05, 21 October 2007 (UTC)