Talk:Riley Ware

GA review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This review is transcluded from Talk:Riley Ware/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: WikiOriginal-9 (talk · contribs) 15:23, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

Reviewer: Gonzo fan2007 (talk · contribs) 14:32, 8 July 2025 (UTC)

I'll do this one. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 14:32, 8 July 2025 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Comments

• Riley Ware III was born on September 19, 1962.[3][2] He grew up in Fort Myers, Florida. you could combine these sentences
• Ware was a two-year letterman from 1988 to 1989.[2] He missed part of the 1986 season due to appendicitis. the order of these sentences should be flipped
• It's not absolutely necessary, but if there is a few key games to highlight during his career, it would help break up the repetition of "signed, stats, waived"
• He was a substitute teacher for the School District of Lee County during his AFL career. I would start a new paragraph with this sentence
• In 2010, it was reported that Ware was still a teacher and coach in Lee County. -->As of 2010, Ware was still a teacher and coach in Lee County.
• References:
  • Formatting: all the formatting looks good and is consistent
  • Reliability: all appear reliable for what is being cited
  • Spot checks: 4, 8, 12, 19, 24, 29, 32, 36

Nice work! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 19:05, 8 July 2025 (UTC)

@Gonzo fan2007: I believe I addressed everything. I added some more details. That's all I could find. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 00:28, 9 July 2025 (UTC)

Passed. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 14:37, 9 July 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.