Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2273cd67b5faddf

Jump to content

Talk:Riga

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:31, 2 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Is there a way to place a US military base in the city? Perhaps one already exists?
As we know, for example, President Zelenskiy spoke categorically against a US military presence in Ukraine. Good.Arbeitsuchendeperson (talk) 10:42, 9 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

General state of the article

[edit]

Why is it so bad? Just compare it to the articles dedicated to Vilnius or Tallinn, or any other EU capital really, it's just so bad, and it doesn't seem like anyone is working on it. Stavanger, a small city that's not even a capital and is nowhere near as historically notable has a much better article written about it. 64.43.50.56 (talk) 14:10, 8 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

If you want to improve it, then go ahead, WP:BEBOLD and improve it, I guess. Also, sidenote: I think Vilnius is in worse condition than this article- Vilnius has TONS of grammar issues and desperately needs c/e (currently working on copy editing it right now). And don't even get me started on Klaipeda- that one is probably the worst vital article I ever saw. -- Shadow of the Starlit Sky 03:56, 8 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Russian spelling

[edit]

SummerKrut added the Russian spelling in this edit with the edit summary restored Russian name that was removed for no reason. There has been a back and forth with Russian/Ukrainian edit summaries that included personal attacks. "Restored" implies that it was recently removed, but I couldn't find an edit that removed it. At least in the last few months, it was never there. I'd appreciate @SummerKrut showing the edit that removed it as otherwise the edit summary is misleading. AncientWalrus (talk) 23:27, 22 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

special:diff/1096047509 Summer talk 00:42, 23 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
That was in July 2022. Your edit summary is misleading, as there was a reason given Russian isn't an official language of Latvia. AncientWalrus (talk) 00:48, 23 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
1) A crime committed 10 years ago is no different from one committed now.
2) Chernivtsi, Gdansk, Strasbourg — all have names in unofficial languages because in all of them such languages either had a great role in their history or are widely spoken. Russians constitute more than a third of Riga's population, so I see no reason not to include a Russian name. Summer talk 13:29, 23 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for explaining your reasons. Having consulted WP:NCPLACE including Russian appears to be justified as there are indeed many Russians living in Riga. Relevant foreign language names (one used by at least 10% of sources in the English language or that is used by a group of people which used to inhabit this geographical place) are permitted.. It would be very helpful if you included relevant policy and reasoning in the future when you (re)add the Russian name to other cities. AncientWalrus (talk) 17:13, 23 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
Russian language banned in Latvia, you can not use it in this article 2A02:A45E:72A7:1:DABB:C1FF:FEAC:7283 (talk) 11:05, 23 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Suggest that in line with the latest trend, Riga can be renamed as Riha. Does not really matter whether anybody else calls it as Riha. Sarvagyana guru (talk) 05:19, 10 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

"Reega" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirect Reega has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 July 22 § Reega until a consensus is reached. Thepharoah17 (talk) 21:52, 22 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:08, 30 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:06, 20 January 2026 (UTC)Reply