Talk:Richard Laymon

Magnum opus

I removed Flesh as Laymon's magnum opus in the infobox. I haven't seen a work pegged as his standout anywhere; if anything, I'd give the nod to The Cellar and its sequels. (If it does end up being Flesh, note that flesh isn't talking about the book...) -- JHunterJ 18:47, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

• fair enough.. i do agree i tentatively put Flesh as that recieved quite a critical lauding upon its release.. for me his masterwork is island anyway. --Soot and stars 21:40, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Would a section on the type of horror Laymon writes be appropriate? He writes in a very adult style with graphic descriptions of sex in violence in the works I've read of his. Not Stephen King type material suitable for everyone. Endy9 (talk) 16:09, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Laypic1.gif

Image:Laypic1.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:43, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

List of works

Q: is it just me or should the books be in order of year released it makes no sense having them as they are now

A: All the books and Fastbacks are now listed in chronological order according to publication date, though the short stories are still listed alphabetically.

Fastbacks?

Question: A number of his works are in a list titled Fastback. What in the world is a "Fastback"? 24.90.172.109 (talk) 07:33, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Answer: Fastback is the term Pitman Learning, an American publisher of educational materials, uses to denote the one-story booklets that it publishes for use in elementary and secondary schools. The publications are aimed at kids who have poor reading habits or who have a negative attitude towards reading, the theory being that such kids are often intimidated by larger works but might be more willing to read something like a booklet and, after doing so, will ultimately be encouraged to read more challenging pieces. When Laymon talks about the booklets in his nonfiction autobiographical work A Writer's Tale, Laymon refers to the pieces as Fastbacks, and since many of his hardcore fans also know them by that name, it seems appropriate to enumerate them under that moniker on Laymon's Wikipedia page. —Michael R. Gates 14:40, 20 Sept 2012 (UTC)

New movie"Barbarian" released on netflix

I thoroughly enjoyed this movie. However, i was surprised to find out it was not credited to have been inspired by Richard Laymons books? The plot and twists follows a pattern of a few of Richard Laymon books such as the Beast house series. Although Richard Laymon books are unpredictable the lack of good and evil characters as a base seemed extremely reminiscent of his works. The concept of a house with secreat tunnels, deformed creatures created by incest by a serial killer, average people being drawn into a horror realm and forced to survive. All seemed to hit pretty close to home on Richard Laymons unique style of writing. Hopefully no intentional plaqerism is at work here without credit being given? 2600:1011:B125:44DD:EC29:C487:8615:5EAD (talk) 01:46, 3 June 2025 (UTC)