Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a29afab7bbd9d806

Jump to content

Talk:Richard Hoagland

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Balarick in topic Untitled

Untitled

[edit]

Changed "conspiracy theorist" to "former NASA consultant and expert on Mars" . Conspiracy theorist is a loaded term and don't express what his main interest is in. Lennon 21:48, 22 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Reverted "former NASA consultant and expert on Mars" to "conspiracy theorist". "Conspiracy theorist" can't possibly be considered a "loaded term" in this case, as it best describes someone who single-handedly authored a wide range of conspiracy theories without providing any evidence in support of such claims. Besides, he never was a consultant for NASA, as he falsely claims. QuintusMessius 00:23, 7 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

"Conspiracy theorist" is a loaded term because there are all sorts of conspiracies; after all, the Boston Tea Party was a conspiracy (and if it's unclear as to why that is so, then please look up the word 'conspiracy'). Furthermore, the term "conspiracy theorist" has become a catch-all phrase used to refer to people whose views do not coincide with those of the mainstream culture. This is not consistent with the aspirations of neutrality that so often make Wikipedia a wonderful source of information. That said, I cannot verify that he was actually a consultant in the employ of NASA; thus, I am changing 'conspiracy theorist' to 'fringe researcher' in order to give him credit for the work he does while clarifying that his research and conclusions are not accepted by the scientific community at large. Balarick (talk) 10:03, 14 June 2013 (UTC)Reply