Talk:Ribblehead Viaduct

Scheduled monument

The NHLE listings for the viaduct and the camp didn't match so I checked with English Heritage and they have confirmed, and updated the entry, that the viaduct itself is not a scheduled monument but the land around the pier foundations is. Nthep (talk) 20:22, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Thank you very much for following it up with EH, and the much harder part of managing to get them to update their entry itself! —Sladen (talk) 21:01, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

This was the latest of minor things I've brought up with them and to be fair they've always been pretty good about fixing errors. Nthep (talk) 21:18, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Ribblehead Viaduct/CommentsTalk:Ribblehead Viaduct/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

. Requires inline references adding using one of the {{Cite}} templates Add infobox, if one is available for viaducts Add conversions to metric for remaining units Sectionalise and expand on things like history Keith D 17:29, 12 August 2007 (UTC) Has quite good structure and some in-line refs. added more. Good enough for a C. Not long, or detailed enough, for a B. Would benefit from having a more recent description of the repairs. Added a project. post-closure.--Robert EA Harvey (talk) 06:55, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Last edited at 06:56, 25 August 2013 (UTC). Substituted at 04:16, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

14 May 2020 edit

2A00:23C5:FC94:C400:C8C8:1241:9455:9E3A Regarding this edit; The Daily Mail is an unreliable source and the formatting was somewhat awry too. If you can find a reliable source, then please re-insert. Thanks. The joy of all things (talk) 15:34, 14 May 2020 (UTC)