Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23da12ccb8d2c38

Jump to content

Talk:Rhizoxin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 19 years ago by Fvasconcellos

What is the state of rhizoxin as a drug? If its FDA/etc. approved then {{template:drugbox}} would be more appropriate than {{template:chembox}}. - Zephyris Talk 21:37, 5 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

As far as I know, and after a quick search, rhizoxin is investigational. The U.S. National Cancer Institute lists only Phase I trials, the most recent concluded nearly 9 years ago. However, if you think {{drugbox}} would be better, feel free to replace it! Fvasconcellos 22:08, 5 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
Just found out it stalled after phase II trials due to low activity in vivo - chembox therefore seems more appropriate. I may have broken some of the footnote fixes you made in extending the article (edit conflict) sorry! :( - Zephyris Talk 22:38, 5 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
No problem—fixing them again only takes a click :) Glad you managed to dig deeper than I did on the clinical trials. Fvasconcellos 23:43, 5 March 2007 (UTC)Reply