Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a24d9f602af54afc

Jump to content

Talk:Rhenium

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 8 months ago by Double sharp in topic Mistake about oxidation states
Good articleRhenium has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 25, 2009Good article nomineeListed

Common oxidation states

[edit]

Currently, the common oxidation state of rhenium that is listed in the infobox is only +4. However, I think +7 should also be a common oxidation state, due to its mention in various textbooks (Housecroft, C. E.; Sharpe, A. G. (2012). Inorganic Chemistry (4th ed.). Prentice Hall. ISBN 978-0273742753.), and manganese and technetium both having +7. Elements lower down the column should have a greater ability to stabilize higher oxidation states. Keres🌕Luna edits! 00:35, 22 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

+1 Double sharp (talk) 03:08, 22 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
I will implement this for now, as it gathered no opposition. Keres🌕Luna edits! 22:38, 10 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Characteristics ranking

[edit]

Isn't the melting/sublimation point of carbon also higher than rhenium's ? 174.103.211.175 (talk) 01:59, 17 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Well, under "Characteristics" carbon is compared to it, but noted as a case that sublimes instead of melts. Double sharp (talk) 02:01, 17 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
The section has no sources. Johnjbarton (talk) 02:04, 17 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Wind Turbines

[edit]

@Sand quartz added multiple subsections on the use of Rhenium in wind turbines. The content was sourced to a single primary source, cited multiple times. The source is not primarily about wind turbines or Rhenium for that matter. The source describes a study of adding Rh to Ni-Cr powder coatings. There is no evidence that the coatings were ever used on turbines. We need secondary sources to show this topic is notable. In view of the unusual multiple references to a single primary sources, please also see WP:COI. Johnjbarton (talk) 15:41, 26 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Mistake about oxidation states

[edit]

The opening paragraph says this: It shows in its compounds a wide variety of oxidation states ranging from −1 to +7. However, the info on the right side of the article shows a -3 state. Which is right? ~2025-32918-34 (talk) 00:58, 12 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Fixed (changed it to "−3 to +7"). Double sharp (talk) 03:50, 12 November 2025 (UTC)Reply