Talk:Revamped

Remix album

Wouldn't this be a remix album? 198.168.106.200 (talk) 22:36, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

I think so, since Wikipedia's definition of Remix album is "album consisting of remixes or rerecorded versions of an artist's earlier released material."BePlus (talk) 23:00, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This review is transcluded from Talk:Revamped/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: CatchMe (talk · contribs) 02:53, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Reviewer: Medxvo (talk · contribs) 21:54, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

• "conceived as "rock versions" in the lead requires a source even if it's stated and sourced in prose, per WP:WHENNOTCITE and WP:LEADCITE. You can just paraphrase it to "reworked into rock-leaning production" or any similar wording
• "national charts in" - "national charts of"
• "consider re-recording" - you can wikilink "re-recording"
• "The original version was written by her, Max Martin, Ali Payami, Alexander Kronlund, and Savan Kotecha" - why are we stating the writers of this song only?
• Since almost all of the charts are called (Scottish Albums, French Albums, Spanish Albums, etc...), I would replace "Scottish Albums / UK Albums / Billboard 200" with "Scotland / the United Kingdom / the United States", that's also how it's written in the lead
• "top 10 album" - "top-10 album"
• The Metacritic score is 74 not 85 :d

Omg??? I think I adjusted the prose from another album article and put that number instead... CatchMe (talk · contribs) 00:12, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

• I don't think "based on 6 reviews" is a case of MOS:NUMNOTES, I think it should be six ...?

I believe "Comparable values near one another should be all spelled out or all in figures, even if one of the numbers would normally be written differently" applies here. CatchMe (talk · contribs) 00:12, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

• "well received from fans" - "well received by fans"
• You can minimize the use of "also"— It can be removed from "It was also named a nostalgic ..." / can be removed or replaced with "additionally" at "A few critics also thought ..." / can be replaced with "similarly" at "Merrill also admired ..."
• "were predominantly highlighted as standouts" can be attributed to Hopper, as in "Hopper highlighted the remixes of .... as standouts"

Added TLOBF source after this because said Skyscraper was one of the "two real improvements". Removed "predominantly", though. Let me know if that's ok. CatchMe (talk · contribs) 00:12, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

• Refs 4, 7, 19, and 20 require |url-status=live

I forget to do that when I add the url-access=limited... But "don't forget" you'd say, lol. CatchMe (talk · contribs) 00:12, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Spot-check from this version

• 1(d) - OK
• 1(g) - OK
• 2(e) - I think the reviewer praised Slash and Bert McCracken, and didn't mention Strauss. If that's the case, we can change "also admired the collaborations" to "similarly admired the collaborations on the album"
• 3(e) - OK
• 3(h) - OK
• 5(g) - OK
• 5(m) - OK
• 5(q) - OK
• 5(t) - OK
• 7(c) - OK
• 9(c) - OK
• 9(g) - OK
• 11 - OK
• 13(a) - OK
• 14(e) - OK
• 16 - doesn't confirm the announcement date I believe? You can probably add this source
• 18 - OK
• 21 - OK
• 24 - OK
• 29 - OK
• 33 - OK
• 36 - OK
• 37 - OK

That's all I guess. @CatchMe: I'll put this On hold for now, just some minor concerns before passing. I have a GAN for the A Place in This World article, I would appreciate your comments if you have time and interest! Medxvo (talk) 21:54, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for another review, @Medxvo: I added some comments above. I will be glad to review another of your articles (if no one has done it) when I finish the one I'm reviewing right now. CatchMe (talk · contribs) 00:12, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Thank you! I'm fine with your comments and justifications and everything looks good. I'll  Pass the article now, congratulations!! Medxvo (talk) 07:30, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Dylan620 talk 00:11, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that Revamped contains ten re-recorded rock versions of previously released songs by Demi Lovato?

• Source: PopMatters, Paste

• • ALT1: ... that Demi Lovato changed a lyric from "Cool for the Summer" for Revamped in order to reflect pride in her sexuality? Source: Paste
  • Reviewed:

Improved to Good Article status by CatchMe (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

CatchMe (talk · contribs) 12:44, 8 January 2025 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: None required.

Overall: Overall, the article was promoted to GA recently enough and, as a whole, satisfies all other requirements. Both of the hooks are interesting and properly cited. I see no reason to not approve this article. JJonahJackalope (talk) 13:59, 8 January 2025 (UTC)