Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22d46b08897227c

Jump to content

Talk:Return ratio

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Jayron32 in topic Undone recent edit

Observations

[edit]

Some comments to improve the article:

1. Return Ratio (T) = - Loop Gain (L), they are equal in magnitude, but different sign in the case you mentioned.
2. I think the example is good; considering ro as well as RS, since both resistors (although in this case in parallel with others) are important when dealing with input/output impedances.
3. I also agree in that RD should be called RC, to follow the traditional nomenclature for the BJT (just as VCC).
Electroning (talk) 21:29, 19 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Simplifying example

[edit]

I think it would be clearer if the example could be simplified.

  • A simpler transistor model neglecting ro would make the figures and equations more compact and at no real loss of generality since ro is just in parallel with RD (why's it called "RD"?)
  • RS could also be neglected

-Roger (talk) 20:21, 28 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Improved simulation methods

[edit]

Two recent and improved simulation methods for the return ratio (or loop gain as I prefer to call it), Tian's method and Middlebrook's General Feedback Theorem (GFT), are described on my webpage http://www.geocities.com/frank_wiedmann/loopgain.html.

Frank —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.144.152.110 (talk) 19:11, 21 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Undone recent edit

[edit]

I undid a recent edit, as it fouled up the page pretty bad, formatting wise. Please read Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners for more info on how to do it right, or ask here or the Wikipedia:Help desk for more specific help. --Jayron32 06:07, 6 February 2012 (UTC)Reply