Talk:Retroviral psi packaging element

Untitled

With reference to the merging- I dont think there is enough information at the moment to warrant four separate pages (one for each stem loop). All 4 pages refer to stem loops which together make up the packaging element. Seems sensible to have all on one page at present? Jennifer_Rfm (talk) 13:53, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

I agree it would seem sensible to merge these into a single more comprehensive page. Alexbateman (talk) 09:28, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Not sure this is really necessary but trying to follow the rules...Jennifer_Rfm (talk) 17:13, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Add the copied from to Jennifer_Rfm (talk) 16:16, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Add the copied from to Jennifer_Rfm (talk) 16:39, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Requested move 25 May 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not moved (non-admin closure) buidhe 15:07, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

---

Retroviral Psi packaging element → Ψ retroviral packaging elementΨ retroviral packaging element – Ψ is the actual proper name of the element itself in the literature. AFAIK Ψ is not a blacklisted character but the system won't let me move it to its actual name. Yanping Nora Soong (talk) 09:11, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

This is a contested technical request. ~Amkgp ✉ 12:35, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

• Oppose as per MOS:ROMANIZATION. It says Names not originally written in one of the Latin-script alphabets (written for example in Greek, Cyrillic, or Chinese scripts) must be given a romanized form for use in English. ~Amkgp ✉ 12:35, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

  But this has always been called Ψ. That's what its written as predominantly in the literature. See also Φ29 DNA polymerase, NF-κB, Ω-logic, π-calculus, Π pad, Π01 class. Yanping Nora Soong (talk) 22:38, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

• Support as proposer. Yanping Nora Soong (talk) 22:38, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
• Oppose - I contested this at RMTR, and MOS:ROMANIZATION is clear on this so it shouldn't really be an issue. Article titles are always in Latin text. That's why have Pi not π, Lambda calculus not λ-calculus etc. The examples listed above seem to break the rules, and should be moved.  — Amakuru (talk) 11:21, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

---

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.