Talk:Restored

Deluxe Gold Edition tracks

Is Go Home actually on the deluxe gold edition? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.96.160.17 (talk) 15:42, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

It's not on mine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chris1emt (talk • contribs) 15:44, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

other meaning

this can also mean the past tense of restore.--Entect (talk) 02:28, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Requested move 24 February 2025

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Not moved based on policy arguments that "Restored" does not necessarily need to be reserved for the purpose of disambiguation, as it is not typical for Wikipedia to feature definitions alone without substantial encyclopedic value. This does not mean, however, that the album is the best primary topic - it is possible that another could usurp it any any point, or that it could become a DAB again (just worth pointing out, as it seems possible given how common the word "Restored" is) (closed by non-admin page mover) ASUKITE 15:20, 19 March 2025 (UTC)

---

Restored → Restored (album)Restored (album) – Dubious primary topic claim. Redirect to disambiguation page at restore or restoration. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 15:36, 24 February 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Sophisticatedevening ^(talk) 17:25, 3 March 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Frost 05:35, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

• Weak oppose as the only subject which goes by this name, and considering that Restore and Restoration are disambiguation pages. Steel1943 (talk) 02:48, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
• Support, and the two disamb pages, 'Restore' and 'Restoration', should actually be combined (which would be the direct link for this title). Randy Kryn (talk) 12:34, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

  Wikipedia is not a dictionary; disambiguation pages for related words should only be combined if there is much overlap, and there is not with Restoration (already very long) and Restore. Restored would only be a WP:PARTIAL for other topics. Peter James (talk) 15:05, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

• Oppose as Wikipedia is not a dictionary and this is why we have hatnotes. cookie monster 755 11:57, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
• Support per nom, no way this is the PT—blindlynx 13:45, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
• Oppose, no other article is proposed for the article title Restored, so there is no need to disambiguate. Andrewa (talk) 20:41, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.