Talk:Rest in Bass
Add topic| Rest in Bass was nominated as a Music good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (February 1, 2026, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GA review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Rest in Bass/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Gdshordy (talk · contribs) 23:14, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: 7rucify (talk · contribs) 15:53, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
Unfortunately, this article is not broad enough. A composition section (a standard in album articles) is not seen, despite the fact that each review that is used in the reception section can easily describe the sound of the album.
As well, it contains some minor issues:
- The user-generated sources, X (Twitter) and Instagram.
- The Southern hip-hop and metal genres in the infobox are unsourced.
- Stylistic issues; for example, Pitchfork not being italicized and the album title Rest in Bass being inconsistently styled in quotation marks or in all caps.
- Some song titles are inconsistently styled in all caps.
- Duplicated wikilinks.
- Almost all citations are missing archived URLs.
- Earwig reports a possible violation, 44%.
- The reissue album Encore is not broad enough to be separated into its own section within the article.
While all these minor issues could be sorted out, the article still wouldn't be broad enough. Overall, the article is far from meeting the criteria 3a. // 7rucify (talk) 15:53, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
