Talk:Research design
Add topic | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Re Grey box completion and validation
[edit]“See also“ “Grey box completion and validation“ has been removed from this and several other topics. Following advice from Wikipedia if there are no objections (please provide your name and reasons), I plan to reinstate the reference in a weeks time.
The removed reference provides techniques for model development an important aim of research design. It is important to have an understanding of how a design is going to be analysed. In particular most models are incomplete (i.e. a grey box) and thus need completion and validation. This reference seems to be within the appropriate content of the “See also” section see Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Layout#See_also_section. BillWhiten (talk) 09:39, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
Reinstated SolidPhase 5 May 2015 thanks BillWhiten (talk) 05:53, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
Matters of correctness
[edit]The second paragraph "Incorporated in the..." of this article is poorly written and not agreeable. There's a big difference between "professional, scholarly, disciplined, principled research" and "exploiting the perspective of research as objective". 97.126.105.172 (talk) 16:04, 23 June 2024 (UTC)