Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a21f648139bc9318

Jump to content

Talk:Research

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Thepharoah17 in topic "Fresh research" listed at Redirects for discussion

Indigenous research methodologies

I would argue that indigenous reseach methodologies needs to be added to this article, as a valid alternative to the european and andro-centric scientific method of research. One of the seminal works discussing the principles of indigenous research methods was authored by Cora Weber-Pillwax and published in the Journal of Educational Thought.[1] Looking for some input as to in which section this belongs. Lavender is the new teal (talk) 20:29, 16 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. Weber-Pillwax C., Indigenous Research Methodology, Journal of Educational Thought, Vol. 33, No. 1 (April, 1999) pp.33-45

Professionalization

The removal of this section screwed up a [large number of wikilinks], which meant a job position. Reverted. --Altenmann >talk 19:39, 3 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

In fact, there is a mix of terminology: Research fellow, Research associate, Research assistant. I have no idea where senior researcher fits better. From wikilinks it looks like it is an official job title not only in Russia.

Also, maybe "Researcher" be better off as a disambig page. --Altenmann >talk 19:44, 3 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

P.S. in Template:TV production there is a link Researcher. I guess needs a separate text for this occupation and a tighter link: it looks like nothing fits well for it in the current generic "Research" article. --Altenmann >talk 19:48, 3 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

"Fresh research" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Fresh research has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 July 18 § Fresh research until a consensus is reached. Thepharoah17 (talk) 09:31, 18 July 2025 (UTC)Reply