Talk:RepRisk

Data products and services

This section repeats a lot that is elsewhere in the article. Does it need to be its own section? Pleasantville (talk) 19:53, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

Rejected by Articles for Creation

This article was rejected by Articles for Creation. The draft has been worked on and is less biased, it can be found here Draft:RepRisk, perhaps they could be merged. Jonpatterns (talk) 16:25, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

I've now merged in the draft.Jonpatterns (talk) 22:24, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Page improvements

Hello wiki editors. I spent a bunch of time researching this buisness as part of a larger project on sustainability. Some of the facts I pulled off the company website where I felt a citation was really needed but I could not find (at least not in US searches) other citations. But these are just a couple of places.

At a quick glance, the changes are:

• adding some more current facts
• adding citations
• some formatting (bolding, italicisizing) and sentence structure improvements
• adding wiki links
• replacing some text that was paragraph form and putting it into numbered lists
• replacing other text with bullet lists
• adding columns or rows of data to tables as appropriate

There is one major section toward the end that displays a template indicating the section is lacking citations and I spent a good deal of time digging some up, but am not quite sure if there are now enough to justify removing the template, so I'm leaving the template in for now until I can determine that what's there now is sufficient.

I should have broken these up into several different "saves" or sessions to be able to more easily see what was changed but that occurred to me after-the-fact.

Any feedback please feel free to ping me @ Hero921 (talk) 21:08, 19 January 2021 (UTC) thanks!!!

Edit request

• What I think should be changed (include citations):

Recent sources no longer tends to describe RepRisk's offering as ESG data. Instead, the focus has shifted to business conduct risk, with reputational risk used less frequently as an alternative term.

• Why it should be changed:

While the shift is primarily one of terminology, there is a noticeable gap between how recent public sources characterize RepRisk and how the company is described on Wikipedia.

• References supporting the possible change (format using the "cite" button):

Mission Transparency (talk) 19:46, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

References

Reply 15-AUG-2026

  Specification requested  

• It is not known what changes are requested to be made. Please state your desired changes in the form of "Change X to Y using Z". (See WP:CHANGEXY.)

Change X to Y using Z

X	A verbatim description of the old text to be removed from the article (if any)
Y	A verbatim description of the new text to be added to the article (if any)
Z	A reference which verifies the requested change

Example edit request:

Please change:

• The Sun's diameter is 25 miles.

↑ This is X ↑

to read as:

• The Sun's diameter is 864,337 miles.

↑ This is Y ↑

using as a reference:

• Harinath, Prisha (2023). The Sun. Academic Press. p. 1.

↑ This is Z ↑

Kindly open a new edit request at your earliest convenience when ready to proceed.
Regards,  Spintendo  18:44, 15 August 2026 (UTC)