Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a26e60dddbe0376a

Jump to content

Talk:Renenutet

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Rosguill in topic "Rannut" listed at Redirects for discussion

Disputed content

[edit]

Uh, this article has problems. With no sources cited whatsoever, I cannot accept the claims about the mystical name-giving personification of childbirth philosophy. Richard H. Wilkinson's Complete Gods and Goddesses of Ancient Egypt says she is a goddess of harvest and agriculture and that her name means "snake who nourishes." He mentions nothing whatsoever about her giving names, and her only connection to childbirth according to him is from being a nurse to children, later identified with Meskhenet and eventually with Shait during the Late Period. This thing about names looks like some non-expert's total speculation based on a speculative but incorrect etymology. 209.162.56.97 (talk) 19:04, 14 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

And this is a less serious problem, but how is a snake-shaped deity "anthropomorphic" anyway? Seriously. 209.162.56.97 (talk) 19:08, 14 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Furthermore, how can the author of this article claim that all Egyptian snake gods were female because Egyptians thought all snakes are female, and then one paragraph later mention Renenutet's son, the male snake god Neheb-kau? The ancient Egyptians believed in multiple male snake gods: including Neheb-kau, Mehen, Wamemty, and especially Apep/Apophis (you'd think anyone familiar with Egyptian myth would have heard of him!). 209.162.56.97 (talk) 19:15, 14 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

I agree with the points you make, the article is poorly written, inaccurate and misleading, why don't you change it?Apepch7 (talk) 20:41, 14 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

"Rannut" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Rannut. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 3#Rannut until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 17:14, 3 March 2021 (UTC)Reply