Talk:Rei III

GA review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This review is transcluded from Talk:Rei III/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: TeenAngels1234 (talk · contribs) 18:41, 16 October 2025 (UTC)

Reviewer: Z. Patterson (talk · contribs) 19:43, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

I will be reviewing the article. Z. Patterson (talk) 19:43, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Copyright violations appear to be unlikely, but the sentence may need to be rewritten to be paraphrased or quoted from the source. According to writer Emily Wati Muir, Rei's battle also has elements of several genres, fusing them: her robotic and military appearance and its connection to religion come from the mecha genre; however, the romance and her sacrifice come from the sekai-kei genre, a narrative genre in which a character's emotion and action have strong consequences on the whole fictional universe. Z. Patterson (talk) 19:59, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

@TeenAngels1234: The article appears to be well-written, well-illustrated, verifiable, stable, neutral, and broad in coverage. I have some points to address.

• I see the word encyclopaedia in the article, but I also see centered in the article. Encyclopaedia is British English, but centered is American English. The article uses DMY dates and heavily uses semicolons, so I suggest changing the spellings to Oxford spelling, a variant of British English that uses -ize spellings instead of -ise spellings.
• Would you mind finding a source for which in turn is a reference to the essay of the same name by the existentialist philosopher Søren Kierkegaard? That part is unsourced, and verifiability with no original research is a criterion of WP:GACR.
• As I noted about Emily Wati Muir's citation, you will need to paraphrase or directly quote it.
• Make sure titles of publications, such as Anime News Network and Fangoria, are italicized.

If you make these changes, I plan to make this a good article. I will give you seven days to address these. Z. Patterson (talk) 21:16, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

@TeenAngels1234: I set the language variety to Oxford spelling for you. Z. Patterson (talk) 03:25, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

@Z. Patterson: OK; I think I fixed every point. My only doubt is about the last one; I don't know if Yahoo should be capilatized or not. Feel free to eventually fix it.--TeenAngels1234 (talk) 20:57, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

@TeenAngels1234: That should be fine. Z. Patterson (talk) 00:48, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.