Talk:Regular ring
Add topicLatest comment: 9 years ago by Kammerer55 in topic The two definitions are not equivalent
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 | The content of the Regular ring page was merged into Regular local ring#Regular ring on 14 September 2020. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article, please see its history. |
This is not a disambiguation page, since the (first) notion of "regular ring" does not have its own page!--129.70.14.128 21:03, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
The two definitions are not equivalent
[edit]Serre's definition of a regular ring is not equivalent to the other one. For instance, Nagata's example of a Noetherian ring with infinite Krull dimension satisfies the first definition of a regular ring, but fails Serre's defintion. The two definitions are only equivalent for rings of finite dimension. Accordingly, the statement that Serre proved the definitions are equivalent needs a source. Zdorovo (talk) 21:21, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
- Fixed this. Added few more references. Kammerer55 (talk) 04:26, 2 May 2017 (UTC)