Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2560043ede25e44

Jump to content

Talk:Redox therapy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 18 years ago by Melissa Ge in topic Citations

Remove prevention studies

[edit]

The section on prevention studies should be removed from the objections because they apply to prevention rather than 'therapy.' The inclusion of large scale low dose prevention studies is not appropriate in a topic on treatment which involves higher doses of "antioxidants" used as drugs - often to generate free radicals in the tissue. TONS


Other uses

[edit]

Presuming redox therapy is that same as anti-oxidant therapy, isn't it used to treat other illnesses caused by red-ox reactions, like certain renal failures? mic 15:35, 30 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Cancer cells an oxidising environment?

[edit]
"As cancer cells rely on an oxidating environment to assist their growth and division, the ascorbate is converted into dehydroascorbate and thence to peroxide much more readily than in healthy cells."

This statement seems very dubious. All living cells have a reducing environment in their cytosol. I'll remove this to the talk page until a reliable source is provided. Tim Vickers (talk) 06:15, 13 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Citations

[edit]

Could we update the footnote references to the newer style? I can provide many of the citations needed to support the statements made in this article, but it could be frustrating having to renumber all the footnotes every time a new reference is added. Also, could we try to make all the references follow the same format? --Melissa Ge (talk) 04:35, 26 May 2008 (UTC)Reply