Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a21b97f88be98cc1

Jump to content

Talk:Redevelopment

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Comments

[edit]

If this articles is being actively maintained: I added the Cleanup-restructure tag due to some structural and tone issues. I initially was going to add a neutrality tag for the final three paragraphs' unsupported claims and apparent negative viewpoint toward redevelopment in certain context. However, it would be more useful to first divide the article into appropriate Sections, addressing the multifaceted article subject, and then address any tone issues. The last three paragraphs in question could be organized into a 'Criticism' section, and provide reference arguments from multiple viewpoints.

If this article is abandoned or the creator is interested in having me make these adjustment, I will do so after some period for discussion & response. Bjmr (talk) 10:01, 18 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

This shouldn't redirect to urban renewal. All urban renewal is redevelopment but not all redevelopment is urban renewal. Urban renewal refers to a very specific initiative in the United States that involved tearing down poor urban neighborhoods. Redevelopment refers to any new construction on a site that has something existing on it which could be a gas station or an industrial park. 64.132.121.227 (talk) 15:19, 11 September 2008 (UTC)Reply


Ok I started this article. I know it's a stub. 64.132.121.227 (talk) 15:37, 11 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Proposed merge with Golf course redevelopment

[edit]

New article does not have enough material or notability to merit stand-alone article TYelliot | Talk | Contribs 10:50, 17 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Agreed and  Done given no objections over 2.5 years Klbrain (talk) 18:07, 8 September 2017 (UTC)Reply