Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a240956f5bc252f1

Jump to content

Talk:Red grouse

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 2 years ago by MPF in topic Species split

Edit Request

[edit]

Would it be acceptable to place Lagpus lagopus scotica as Vulnerable under the European assesment of the Willow ptarmigan? http://oldredlist.iucnredlist.org/details/22679460/1 (The UK is listed as a country of occurance) I will not make the edit until permission is given. Donkey8 (talk) 02:06, 11 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Donkey8, I think that may be a bit misleading on its own, it's the local status of this subspecies that's more relevant. Perhaps better to say that the willow grouse as a species is Vulnerable, and that this subspecies is Amber listed in the UK, as here Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:16, 11 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Contradictory hatnote?

[edit]

The hatnote on this page says, "Not to be confused with Moorcock", but the disambiguation page Moorcock includes under Other uses, "the red grouse". No wonder we're confused. Theodore Kloba () 20:47, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Not contradictory. That's how disambiguation pages work. - UtherSRG (talk) 21:02, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Species split

[edit]

Heads up: IOC are splitting Red Grouse as a separate species Lagopus scotica, effective 1 July 2024 with IOC version 14.2 - MPF (talk) 20:25, 19 June 2024 (UTC)Reply