Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism
Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments2 people in discussion
@Yue, what do you expect precisely with the template? Do you want me to add overlapping references to uncontroversial statements, just so there is a more 'balanced' distribution of references? Or do you consider any of the statements to be controversial? Do you want me to add older (and/or outdated) sources just to "use" more sources? Clarifications are welcome! Dajasj (talk) 19:42, 6 February 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Dajasj: The article you've made is well-written and structured, but it will most likely fail criteria two of the GA criteria list if you don't diversify the sourcing. I'm not saying this is what the article is because I haven't read the Hartmans source, but you don't want the article to be or appear to be a (translated) mirror of Hartmans' work. Hartmans, like any author including us, had specific intentions and made choices about what he wanted to include or focus on in his work. Using only or mostly his one work means you are likely reflecting his focus. It'd be helpful not only to the article's development (i.e. for the purpose of a future GA nomination) but also your own learning and curiosity of the subject if you diversify and increase the number of sources you consult.
Sorry about forgetting to write this earlier and explaining myself though; I got sidetracked by my lunch. I removed the tag since it isn't helpful to the writers of this article anyways, of which you are probably the main and sole one as of late. Cheers. Yue💌22:00, 6 February 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for clarifying and removing the tag. I was aware that it was not yet ready for GA, but was slightly annoyed by the tag.
I started with reading Hartmans, followed by Linmans and Wijne. That's why Hartmans is mostly used, but a large portion of the information is also mentioned by Linmans and Wijne. Wijne is also older and at some points outdated. I mostly added Linmans as source where it contradict Hartmans or where it has another focus.
The redirect Orange Monday has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 September 30 § Orange Monday until a consensus is reached. Thepharoah17 (talk) 01:43, 4 October 2025 (UTC)