Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23465f55b06a3ae

Jump to content

Talk:Red River Delta

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 11 months ago by Favonian in topic Requested move 26 July 2025

Proposed merge into Dong Bang Song Hong

[edit]

The article Vietnam links the Western name "Red River Delta" to the Vietnamese name "Dong Bang Song Hong". Askari Mark (Talk) 18:53, 7 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Needs literal meaning

[edit]

"Đồng Bằng Sông Hồng" needs literal meaning. Badagnani 04:19, 8 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Translate

[edit]

How was Hồng translated as Red. 69.234.183.155 (talk) 21:37, 30 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

See . Badagnani (talk) 07:32, 31 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Red River (Asia) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. RMCD bot 19:17, 3 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Hong River which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. RMCD bot 19:45, 10 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Hong River which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. RMCD bot 19:03, 13 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Population source details

[edit]

Dear User:Remsense, about your recent edit: 1222167034.

I think in this case, more details is necessary because: (1) The source is an interactive table; (2) To make clear about Year info of the source. In the future, if someone wants to update the figure, they only need to update the Year info.

Thanks. Zywk (talk) 10:07, 4 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

I do not think any level of interactivity in itself is necessary to explain in a reference footnote, as long as it's generally understood by an audience. I would say the average Wikipedia reader is likely able to comfortably make use of the source. Remsense 10:09, 4 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 26 July 2025

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Favonian (talk) 13:23, 2 August 2025 (UTC)Reply


Red River Delta ? – Red River Delta is ambiguous. See Red River of the South, Red River of the North, and Red River (disambiguation). Red River Delta should just redirect to Red River. 2600:1700:6180:6290:DDE:4B30:11F3:FB21 (talk) 13:12, 26 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Oppose I don't see any need to move the page given that none of these other red rivers have deltas with pages DervotNum4 (talk) 15:56, 27 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
Oppose. There are no other Red River Deltas with Wikipedia pages. ~~ Jessintime (talk) 20:08, 30 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.