Talk:Red Croatia

Dubious

I've removed most of the blathering that seemed to stem from that old election-time pamphlet that had linked Doclean Academy of Sciences and Arts and Milo Đukanović's political campaign. A reference would be necessary to avoid this mention looking like soapboxing. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 09:28, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

This is pure Croatian Nationslism nothing about history

Collapsed forum conversation

I nice try to represent Zahumle and people there as Croats by making out some conclusions which don't exist in history. This is pure croatian nationalism, nothing to do whit history. 2A01:C22:C1D2:E500:F43A:82BD:C7BF:EBB (talk) 15:17, 24 November 2022 (UTC) I believe that source are included in the article. Right? Walter9 (talk) 19:18, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

This is not historical term

Collapsed forum conversation

This is not historical, but pseudo-historical. Specifically, this term first appears in a transcript, not in the original, of the Chronicle of the Priest of Duklja. The manuscript was created within the Catholic Church in Croatia in the 14th century, if I recall correctly (commissioned by the Šubić family, who used it to justify their expansion into Hum, which was previously under the Nemanjić dynasty). Dandolo and Biondo (the only ones, alongside this transcript, to mention "Red Croatia") adopted this term from the transcript, not from the original source. The term was later misused in the second half of the 19th and 20th centuries to support the territorial ambitions of Croatian nationalists and chauvinists in Bosnia and Herzegovina. 46.239.6.185 (talk) 10:01, 24 November 2024 (UTC)