Talk:Rear-engine design
Add topic | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
 |
This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors:
The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links. Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error |
Yes! These two articles should definitely be merged as they discuss the same topic but with an different search name such that either search name leads you to the same article.
Please merge
[edit]Definitely, they belong together, please merge Moebiusuibeom-en (talk) 06:13, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
- My mistake, rear engine design is one thing and RR is rear–engine/rear–drive only Moebiusuibeom-en (talk) 16:38, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
Merger proposal
[edit]I propose to this into Rear-engine, rear-wheel-drive layout. All of the content here is duplicated in Rear-engine, rear-wheel-drive layout since all rear wheel engined vehicles are also rear wheel drive. Cornellier (talk) 14:42, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
Smart/Twingo
[edit]All generations of the Smart ForTwo (including the related Renault Twingo) have the engine's crankshaft ahead of the rear axle line. Although in at least some generations the engine leans back over the axle, this is not a rear-engine design. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brian abp (talk • contribs) 03:00, 23 April 2019 (UTC)