Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22fcc01da10c526

Jump to content

Talk:Reality tunnel

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Lennart97 in topic See also

Where is it claimed that cybernetics can help when trying to enlarge ones reality tunnel? I see no good connection with cybernetics and reality tunnels. I've read some of the works of Wilson and Leary, but never noticed the use of cybernetics. Please elucidate.

I imagine the editor was just referring to cybernetics as a feedback mechanism, which would seem to fit in with the other techniques listed. Wibbble 15:34, 11 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Abnormal Psychology?

[edit]

Why is this in the category of Abnormal Psychology? Surely it's applicable to all psychology, not just the abnormal? --203.113.232.164 07:34, 29 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Agree. Changed to Popular psychology until someone adds something more appropriate (I don't know the cat system that well). --Quiddity 20:31, 29 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hyphenation?

[edit]

Shouldn't the term "reality-tunnel" be hyphenated? Wilson hyphenates it in the numerous sources I've read, and in the one reference I was able to find from Leary (Neuropolitique) he also hyphenates it. Is there a way to change the article's title?  Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.61.201.150 (talk)

Significance?

[edit]

The term "reality tunnel" (hyphenated or unhyphenated) seems to be just a fancy term for saying "blinkered". Does it really need an article by itself, as opposed to being in the articles for Timothy Leary or Robert Anton Wilson? Autarch (talk) 19:56, 24 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

See also

[edit]

The See also section seems way, way too long, especially for a short article like this. Maybe someone who has some expertise on this subject matter can clean it up a bit! Lennart97 (talk) 13:03, 10 October 2020 (UTC)Reply