Talk:ReDRagon
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the ReDRagon article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
ReDRagon and The Undisputed Era redirect
[edit]When the original article for The Undisputed Era was deleted the stable had not accomplished much. With The Undisputed Era now being four members as well as them having held multiple titles I feel as the redirect to ReDRagon's page is not necessary anymore and it should have its own article now to talk about the entire stable's accomplishments. Brody's Ghost (talk) 04:57, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
I agree, just because both ReDRagon and Undisputed Era had both O'Reilly and Fish, doesn't mean the stable is the same, is almost as saying The Mega Powers was the same stable as the New World Order. XxXblackXxX (talk) 19:10, 15 April, 2018 (UTC)
- Please discuss whether the stable has enough to separate from this article first before drafting anything. You'll need significant coverage of the stable itself from secondary sources independent of the subject to meet GNG. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:43, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- Discussion is now going on WT:PROWRESTLING. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:06, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
Members
[edit]Now that The Undisputed ERA have their own page. reDRagon should only have Fish and O'Reilly as members. Ron234 (talk) 19:42, 30 April 2018 (UTC)