Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a245764caf75f54b

Jump to content

Talk:Rashbam

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 14 years ago by In ictu oculi in topic Title POV

Untitled

[edit]

I removed the assertion that the Rashbam's stress on peshat was the result of disputations with the Church. In fact, I honestly doubt whether he was involved in disputations at all. Without a source, this edit is difficult to uphold. JFW | T@lk 22:04, 11 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Title POV

[edit]

The title isn't neutral - not only is it not even the guy's actual name, but it includes an honourific - Rabbi. This violates the general Neutrality rule that wikipedia does not use honourifics (eg. Christ, PBUH, Rev., etc.) - see Wikipedia:Naming conventions (clergy). Newman Luke (talk) 16:18, 17 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

WP:NAME#Common names. The article is named Mother Theresa, not Agnesë Gonxhe Bojaxhiu. -- Avi (talk) 17:37, 25 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
Hi Avi. The reason for that is that Mother Teresa is the name which appears in WP:RS for the woman born Agnesë Gonxhe Bojaxhiu. It's also the English form rather than মাদার টেরিজা, though that's by the by. In the case of Shmuel ben Meir he never adopted another name, WP:RS refer to him as Samuel ben Meir, including the Jewish Encyclopedia. Per Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English):

The title of an article should generally use the version of the name of the subject which is most common in the English language, as you would find it in reliable sources

In ictu oculi (talk) 02:56, 2 September 2011 (UTC)Reply