Talk:RampART

ramparts merger

Could this page merged with Ramparts?

-definetly merge it. AND lets clean it up.

yes it should be merged and yes it should be cleaned up ... time permitting, i will do that this week. i think this page is better to keep as it is the more commonly known name, although the structure is better on the other page and in will try to incorporate that here. Mujinga 17:43, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

i wikified the page. i also took out some stuff which i feel belongs better on the social centre page. more tweaks probably necessary Mujinga 20:26, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

I merged the ramparts page into this and it now redirects here Mujinga 11:57, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

AFd

The sourcing for this article is very poor - just various bits of descriptive accounts from indiemedia - a site of dubious merits. Can anyone provide any better sources or are we off to AFD. --Cameron Scott (talk) 16:09, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Google News is right over there, hombre. the skomorokh 16:28, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

I looked, that's why I'm asking. I guess the answer is no. --Cameron Scott (talk) 16:30, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

• http://www.rampart.co.nr

  Triggered by \bco\.nr\b on the global blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 17:48, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on RampART. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060709220159/http://wiki.hacklab.org.uk/index.php/RampART to http://wiki.hacklab.org.uk/index.php/RampART

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:40, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

COI edit request: mention in popular culture

Declaration of conflict of interest. I am Giuseppe Checchia, the author of the book named below. I have a conflict of interest and am therefore not editing the article myself. I have added {{connected contributor}} at the top of this page.

Requested edit. Add a short section at the end of the article, immediately before ==See also==:

==In popular culture==
The 2026 Italian novel ''Genesi di un hacker'' by Giuseppe Checchia is freely inspired by the author's experience of rampART.<ref>{{cite news |last=Casarotti |first=Monia |script-title=it:La realtà degli hacker e la sicurezza informatica nel primo libro di Giuseppe Checchia |trans-title=The reality of hackers and computer security in Giuseppe Checchia's first book |url=https://primatreviglio.it/attualita/la-realta-degli-hacker-e-la-sicurezza-informatica-nel-primo-libro-di-giuseppe-checchia/ |work=Prima Treviglio |date=21 October 2025 |language=it}}</ref>

Notes on sourcing.

• The link between the novel and rampART is stated by an independent Italian regional newspaper, not by me or by my publisher.
• For completeness of this disclosure: the novel carries as an appendix a non-fiction essay of mine which discusses rampART directly, and which also exists as a separately printed private booklet. I am not asking for either to be used as a source anywhere in the article. The essay rests partly on published literature and partly on my own recollection of the place, so it would be a primary source carrying an obvious conflict of interest, and I would rather leave that judgement entirely to uninvolved editors
• I am not asking for the book to be cited for any factual claim about rampART, and I am aware that neither a novel nor a participant's account is a reliable source for the history of the centre
• On weight, for whatever editors judge it to be worth: the critical infrastructure lab at the University of Amsterdam listed the book on its "in the media" page in May 2026, in connection with the published work of one of its researchers.

If a standalone section seems undue, the same sentence works appended to the end of ==Background==. If the mention seems undue altogether, I will not press the point.

Eldoleo (talk) 15:21, 19 August 2026 (UTC)