Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2677b7aed14ddf0

Jump to content

Talk:Ralph Khoury

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 10 months ago by Nehme1499 in topic Ottawa South United spells in infobox

Ottawa South United spells in infobox

[edit]

@RedPatch and Oltrepier: do you think it makes sense to merge the 2023 and 2025 OSU spells into one [2023–2025; 8 (0)]? OSU is an affiliate club to Atletico Ottawa, so I'm not sure it makes sense to define the 2025 spell as a separate "loan". Nehme1499 15:19, 17 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Nehme1499 I lean towards a "no", mainly because it's something we usually do for players that feature in the official reserve team of a specific club, whereas affiliate clubs are supposed to be more independent administration-wise. Oltrepier (talk) 15:29, 17 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
I lean towards no as well, given they are separate clubs. (Last year, players on AO weren't allowed to move to OSU on short-term loans, this year they were, so its not a true first team/second team situation). Also, since he didn't play in 2024 with them, it would still be two spells as well. RedPatch (talk) 17:15, 17 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
@RedPatch and Oltrepier: Thanks for your input :) On a side note, should we include his stats in the 2024 Ligue1 Québec reserve division (5 games, 3 goals)? Or, at least, should we extend the 2023 spell to 2023–2024 (since he was playing with them in 2024 as well)? Nehme1499 17:41, 17 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
The Reserve division in L1Q is a U19 division (U21 for female), so I wouldn't include the stats, since it's technically youth rather than senior. Maybe we put 2022-2024 in the youth years section? RedPatch (talk) 17:58, 17 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
Makes sense, I have updated the infobox. Nehme1499 17:59, 17 September 2025 (UTC)Reply