Talk:RallyPoint
Add topicLatest comment: 4 years ago by GregJackP in topic There seems to be a problem with certain Admins of this site killing comments that they don't seem to agree with. I don't understand the criteria for selecting these Administrators but feel it needs some scrutiny.
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the RallyPoint article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
I don't have time to do any more thinning out of unencyclopedic promotional language and corporate jargon from this article, and so I tagged it in case others happen to be driving by. This article is far too laudatory, based on primary sources, and overdetailed as though it was an advertising brochure. Far more objective eyes need to be on it. - Julietdeltalima (talk) 19:28, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
The promotional content has been undone. I would recommend removing the 'This article contains content that is written like an advertisement.' at this time.
There seems to be a problem with certain Admins of this site killing comments that they don't seem to agree with. I don't understand the criteria for selecting these Administrators but feel it needs some scrutiny.
[edit]Bold text — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.223.58.4 (talk) 21:52, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
- I removed quite a bit of promotional content and unnecessary fluff. I'm going to try and add to the article. DISCLOSURE: I am a member of the RP site and post there on a regular basis, I am not an employee of the site, nor am I receiving any compensation from the site for my edits. I'm a long-time WP editor with several featured articles, whose sole interest is improving the article. GregJackP Boomer! 04:34, 9 November 2021 (UTC)