Talk:Raja Haridas

Why is this article so one sided? It's like an edgy 14 year old wrote this

There are a lot of issues with this page and the most obvious is how the article is heavily biased and written from the perspective of a fan rather than upholding Wikipedia's rules of neutrality. There are no references for these extreme claims either like “Sikandar Shah begged for his life” these claims are dramatic but uncited - no reliable sources are referenced. The article has a few historical-sounding references (e.g., Brihattara Tamrolipter Itihas, Banglar Itihas), but none are linked to actual pages or verifiable sources. Massive casualty figures and diplomatic dialogues need strong scholarly support or contemporary chronicles. It reads like a glorified epic of victory, without acknowledging uncertainties, contradictory sources, or the context of surrounding historians. It emphasizes Hindu valor and frames Muslim rulers in an overly negative, simplistic manner. 86.30.206.58 (talk) 10:59, 22 July 2025 (UTC)