Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2968de79af6be76

Jump to content

Talk:Railways in Adelaide

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 7 years ago by 150.101.89.150 in topic Old stock

Comments by Pdfpdf

[edit]

The comments raised by Pdfpdf here are an issue with most Railways in xxx pages. Railways in Sydney is somewhat well rounded, fobbing off nitty gritty to CityRail. Railways in Melbourne focuses on the sparks, Freight railways in Melbourne covers the other stuff. Rail transport in Victoria is pretty well rounded with non-passenger and non-government stuff covered. Wongm (talk) 12:53, 22 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Railways in Adelaide. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:59, 12 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Old stock

[edit]

What about the old stock then? This article tells us about the newer rolling stock.  Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.101.89.150 (talk) 08:19, 3 June 2019 (UTC)Reply