Talk:Rail integration system

Pictures

Shouldn't we have someone upload a picture for the article? Preferably showing different RIS systems on different guns.Halofanatic333 (talk) 15:13, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Warpac?

Anything on Soviet equivalents? Andy Dingley (talk) 20:50, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

• Called a Warsaw rail. Started for scopes and became general for most of the AK- ### family. Citeable sources detailing discussions in English are hard to find compared to the various scopes and optics that use the system.2602:306:CE27:DC90:3DFA:E65B:704A:4C7E (talk) 08:46, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

avoid merging

 With https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rail_system_(firearms) as mentioned on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Rail_system_%28firearms%29

Compare that stub on https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rail_system_%28firearms%29&oldid=766279707 from 08:51, 19 February 2017‎ to the massive edits to https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rail_system_(firearms)&oldid=803731463 of October 4th 2017

That Stub has been built up and out and Rail Integration System needs the same detail and love. Especially with the standardization of rail integrated power systems to feed optics and other accessories soldiers and/or civilians may need and use. This article has plenty of potential and a lot more coming in the near future. 2602:306:CE27:DC90:3DFA:E65B:704A:4C7E (talk) 08:46, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Capitalization

Is the proper capitalization "rail integration system" or is it "Rail Integration System"? The title uses the latter, but the body of the article uses the former. One or the other should be used for both. Also, why is the first term used "rail interface system" when the article title uses "integration"? If neither is more strictly correct than the other, the first usage should be "integration". WP Ludicer (talk) 04:05, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Since it is a very general term I would say it is correct to use sentence case. I therefore moved the article to reflect that. Sauer202 (talk) 20:26, 6 December 2022 (UTC)