Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a44d1878bc01223c

Jump to content

Talk:Raging River

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 4 days ago by Premeditated Chaos in topic GA review

Did you know nomination

[edit]

Raging River
Raging River
  • ... that during floods, the Raging River (pictured) can reach flow rates over 300 times its summer average?
  • Source: Bunn, Jeremy (2019). Raging River Channel Migration Study. pp 23-24 your.kingcounty.gov/dnrp/library/water-and-land/flooding/CMZs/raging-river/2019-raging-river-cmz-study-wmaps.pdf
5x expanded by Generalissima (talk). Number of QPQs required: 2. DYK is currently in unreviewed backlog mode and nominator has 165 past nominations.

Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 14:38, 3 September 2026 (UTC).Reply

@Generalissima: My apologies, was taken away from Wiki by life. Im working on it now.--Kevmin § 17:38, 12 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
Article expansion new enough and long enough. Article is well cited and neutrally written. I see the data from the hook source in the source and the article, but I don't see the 300 times in either. I assume we are going with it being a CALC situation between the 10-20 and the 6000+ numbers, but I suspect we should have the 300 times wording in the article along with a sentence more explicitly calling it out.--Kevmin § 17:57, 12 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Generalissima: for visibility--Kevmin § 15:59, 14 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
  • Article expansion new enough and long enough. Article is well cited and neutrally written. no policy issues identified in the article, hook now in article with citation, hook fact is basic CALC, and follows citation. Images are main page complaint. We are good to go.--Kevmin § 16:48, 15 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

GA review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Raging River/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Generalissima (talk · contribs) 16:08, 2 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: Premeditated Chaos (talk · contribs) 03:07, 29 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Claiming. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 03:07, 29 September 2026 (UTC)Reply